By Jeremy Hance
Only 28 percent of bonobo habitat remains suitable for the African great ape, according to the most comprehensive study of species' range yet appearing in Biodiversity Conservation. The paper, involving over 30 scientists, analyzes the world's bonobo population using nest counts, remote sensing imagery, and computer modeling. The researchers found that bonobo presence was mostly correlated with human absence.
"Distance from agriculture and forest edge density best predicted bonobo occurrence [...] These results suggest that bonobos either avoid areas of higher human activity, fragmented forests, or both, and that humans reduce the effective habitat of bonobos," the scientists write.
Not identified as a separate species from the more well-known chimpanzee until the Twentieth Century, bonobos (Pan paniscus) have been little studied compared to their more widespread cousins. Bonobos are only found in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), separated from chimpanzees by the Congo River. Smaller than chimps, bonobos are most known for their matriarchal society and their tendency to solve conflict through sexual behavior, which has given them the moniker of the "make love, not war" apes.
"For bonobos to survive over the next 100 years or longer, it is extremely important that we understand the extent of their range, their distribution, and drivers of that distribution so that conservation actions can be targeted in the most effective way," said co-author Ashley Vosper with the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS). "Bonobos are probably the least understood great ape in Africa, so this paper is pivotal in increasing our knowledge and understanding of this beautiful and charismatic animal."
Compiling data from 2003-2010, the scientists identified 2,364 "nest blocks," i.e. a one hectare area containing bonobo nests. Researchers have yet to estimate the total population of bonobos, but in the past they have speculated somewhere between 30,000 and 50,000.
The scientists believe that bonobos largely avoid human areas because of rampant bushmeat hunting.
"Areas closer to agriculture and roads are closer to human populations who tend to hunt in the surrounding forest," they write. "Roads and navigable rivers provide human access to areas that would otherwise likely be less vulnerable to hunting." More....